Within the depth-psychology corpus, the maze functions as a charged symbol standing at the intersection of the unconscious, initiation, death-rebirth, and the labyrinthine complexity of human life. Jung identifies the maze explicitly as a symbol of the unconscious itself, clustering it alongside corridors and labyrinths as images through which the psyche figures its own obscurity at the onset of individuation. Neumann elaborates the archetype structurally, cataloguing the labyrinth’s invariant traits—its governance by a feminine presiding figure, its inextricable association with death and rebirth, and its ritual enactment as passage through the devouring body of the Great Mother. Rank situates the labyrinthine form within the mythological complex of Daedalus and the Minotaur, reading the tortuous maze as an architectural expression of the womb-underworld and the hero’s need for Ariadne’s thread as the ego’s dependence on a guiding principle to navigate regression. Campbell traces labyrinthine motifs from Paleolithic cave spirals through Malekula’s Journey of the Dead, showing how the maze encodes the universal initiatory path. Kerényi discovers in the Cretan meander pattern the labyrinth’s original visual grammar, arguing that its winding intervals represent the path of life itself. Nussbaum, reading Seneca, extends the figure philosophically: the maze becomes the image of a life poorly lived, navigable only by reason’s guiding thread. The term thus bridges mythological, clinical, and philosophical registers, making it one of the corpus’s most semantically dense spatial symbols.