Materia occupies a philosophically sovereign position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a cosmological substrate, an alchemical operative concept, and a psychological symbol of the unconscious in its most primordial state. The lineage is unambiguous: from Plato’s Timaeus, where the ‘receiving principle’ is rendered formless precisely so that it may receive every form, through Plotinus’s insistence that Matter is ontologically necessary to quality and quantity, to the alchemical prima materia as both the raw chaos from which the Work begins and the concealed divine substance awaiting liberation. Jung inherits this entire tradition and performs the decisive psychological inversion: the materia — especially the prima materia — becomes a projection screen for unconscious contents; what the alchemist believes he encounters in matter is, Jung argues, chiefly the data of his own unconscious. Yet this is not a reductive dismissal: for Jung, the deity is genuinely ‘sleeping in matter,’ and the Work is the liberation of that immanent divinity. Edinger and von Franz extend this reading into clinical and cosmological registers respectively, while Abraham’s lexicographical work establishes the full range of synonyms — sea, chaos, Adam, Mercurius, prima materia — that the tradition accumulated. Simondon, outlier yet relevant, interrogates the hylomorphic relation between matter and form at the ontogenetic level, pressing against the Aristotelian schema that underlies all alchemical matter-theory. The central tension throughout is between materia as inert substratum and materia as living, generative, spiritually charged ground.