Within the depth-psychology corpus, Libra is treated not primarily as a sign of romantic sociability — a popular misconception that Greene explicitly dismisses — but as an archetype of discriminating judgement, ethical idealism, and the psychic tension between rational weighing and instinctual life. Greene’s sustained mythological analysis in *The Astrology of Fate* locates Libra’s core dynamic in the figures of Paris and Teiresias: both are compelled to judge, both suffer for it, and both illuminate the sign’s peculiar vulnerability when cool intellect transgresses the domain of Eros. Hillman, cited through Nichols, grounds justice itself in the feeling function, making Saturn’s exaltation in Libra a statement about evaluated, measured moral response rather than cold legalism. Sasportas extends the archetype through houses and ascending signs, emphasizing the paralysis inherent in Libra’s capacity to hold all perspectives simultaneously — a crippling of action that he diagnoses as the shadow-side of genuine fairness. Cunningham positions Libra structurally as Venus-ruled air, governing the Seventh House domain of partnership and shared values. Across all voices, the sign stands at the intersection of beauty, justice, relationship, and the painful epistemological burden of choice — a genuinely complex psychological node that rewards archetypal rather than merely characterological reading.