Within the depth-psychology corpus, the term ‘Li’ operates on at least three distinct registers, each demanding careful discrimination. Most pervasively, Li designates the twenty-ninth hexagram’s paired complement in the I Ching tradition: the trigram of Fire, the Clinging, associated with brightness, the sun, the feminine principle of dependence, and psychic consciousness. Richard Wilhelm’s translations establish Li as occupying the southern position in the Inner-World Arrangement—the moment when vegetative life passes into conscious awareness—while Alfred Huang insists on Li’s primacy as symbol of the yang-within-yin, paired with Kan as the great cosmological dyad closing the Upper Canon. Marie-Louise von Franz deepens this symbology in depth-psychological terms, reading Li’s defining quality—dependence on an underlying material substrate—as the principle of cultural consciousness itself, an ordered but receptive feminine principle standing in dialectical tension with the dark masculine dynamic of K’an. Separately, in Iain McGilchrist’s philosophical neuroscience, lǐ (the Confucian ordering principle) appears as ontological ground for dynamic natural pattern, closer to Heraclitean logos than to Platonic reason. A further, narrative register appears in von Franz’s Puer Aeternus commentary, where ‘Li’ is a character name carrying symbolic weight. The tension between Li-as-cosmic-trigram and lǐ-as-metaphysical-principle constitutes the central interpretive problem for this entry.