The concept of Cosmic Order occupies a central and contested position across the depth-psychological corpus, functioning simultaneously as a cosmological postulate, a mythological inheritance, and a psychological regulatory ideal. The term encompasses the ancient Greek kosmos — with its irreducible aesthetic, moral, and mathematical resonances — as well as its cognate formulations across traditions: dharma, Tao, moira, me, rita, and the Stoic logos. Campbell identifies approximately 3200 B.C. as the moment when the concept crystallized into explicit cultural form, while Hillman retrieves the original Greek atmospheric richness of kosmos against its reduction to a ‘vast gasbag.’ Jonas maps the Gnostic rupture with classical cosmic order as one of antiquity’s most consequential intellectual events: where Stoic and Platonic thought affirmed human participation in a rational, ensouled, and beneficent whole, Gnostic consciousness experienced that same order as alien machinery of fate. Von Franz reads cosmic order through the lens of archetypal psychology, locating its psychic correlates in time-mandala structures, the unus mundus, and number symbolism. Aurobindo grounds cosmic law not in external imposition but in the self-manifestation of Sachchidananda through Supermind. The cardinal tension running through the corpus is between order experienced as participation and order experienced as imprisonment — a polarity that defines both the gnostic revolt and the Jungian therapeutic aspiration.