Intoxication occupies a peculiarly double register within the depth-psychological corpus: it appears simultaneously as physiological event, archetypal constellation, and threshold phenomenon pointing beyond ordinary consciousness. Nietzsche provides the formative theoretical statement, treating intoxication as nature’s own artistic medium — the Dionysiac force through which the human being ceases to be an artist and becomes a work of art. Neumann extends this mythological frame, tracing the connection between fermented grain, fertility ritual, and the sacramental transformation of earthly matter into spirit, situating intoxication within the symbolism of mystery religion. Campbell, drawing on Rudolf Otto, describes intoxication as one mode through which the numinous breaks into consciousness — the more violent face of a spectrum that also includes tranquil worship. Peterson, writing from a post-Jungian clinical perspective, argues that any deliberate pursuit of transformation through intoxicants — including therapeutic uses of psychedelics — manifests the archetype of the Alcoholic, an autonomous complex with power to seduce even serious practitioners. Hari, citing Ronald Siegel and Stuart Walton, presses the naturalistic case: the drive toward intoxication is constitutive of animal life itself, and its repression is a denial of endogenous neurochemistry. The neurobiological literature (Koob, Lovelock, Addenbrooke) treats intoxication as the initiating stage of addiction’s recursive cycle, mapping its dopaminergic substrate. Together these voices reveal a central tension: whether intoxication is primarily a gateway to the sacred, a symptom of psychic deficiency, or a biological drive — or, in the most sophisticated accounts, all three simultaneously.