The term ‘instant’ occupies a structurally significant position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a unit of temporal experience, a site of ontological disclosure, and a threshold for consciousness. The range of treatment is striking. In the Sufi theosophy of Ibn ‘Arabi as read by Corbin, the instant is cosmological: the Creative Being manifests at every instant in a new cloak, such that creation is not a past event but a perpetual theophany renewed moment by moment. Hadot’s excavation of Stoic practice, particularly Marcus Aurelius, locates the instant as the primary object of ascetic attention — life composed of nothing but a suite of instants, each mastered through exact definition and concentration. McGilchrist challenges the reductive atomism of clock-time, arguing that time is not made of duration-less instants any more than a line is made of points, insisting on irreducibility and the necessity of a leap. Watts and Suzuki, working from Zen, dissolve the instant into the eternal present — a flowing now that is neither permanent nor impermanent. These positions stand in productive tension: the instant as cosmic renewal (Corbin), ethical fulcrum (Hadot), ontological paradox (McGilchrist), and non-dual presence (Watts, Suzuki). What unites them is the conviction that the instant is not merely a division of chronological time but the very medium through which being, consciousness, and transformation become available.