The initiation rite stands as one of the most densely theorized constructs in the depth-psychology corpus, commanding attention from mythographers, anthropologists, phenomenologists of religion, and analytical psychologists alike. The field’s major voices converge on a core structural claim: initiation enacts a symbolic death and rebirth that reorganizes the psyche, separating the ego from infantile dependencies and reorienting it toward collective meaning and transpersonal identity. Jung identifies the initiation’s essential mood as a willingness to die — distinguishing it sharply from the hero myth, where ambition drives the protagonist forward — while Henderson and others locate it as the first stage in the differentiation of consciousness. Eliade systematizes the cross-cultural morphology: ordeals, symbolic burial, regression to embryonic states, and ascensional return. Turner contributes the concept of liminality as the structural heart of the rite, the threshold condition in which social distinctions dissolve and communitas replaces structure. Harrison traces Greek religious forms — Kouretes, Dithyramb, Zagreus — back to tribal initiatory substrata. Neumann situates the initiatory form within the masculine collective’s dialectical break from the matriarchal uroboros. The unifying tension across the corpus is between the rite’s social function — transmitting values, marking gender transitions, constituting community — and its psychological function as catalyst for individuation. Hollis registers the modern crisis: the withering of genuine initiatory containers leaves contemporary men, and the culture at large, in a condition of chronic uninitiation.