Identity Reconstitution occupies a contested and generative space within the depth-psychological corpus, spanning phenomenological, narrative, Jungian, and existential traditions. The term denotes not merely the repair of a disrupted sense of self, but the active recomposition of selfhood following dissolution—whether through illness, addiction recovery, mythic dismemberment, or the mortificatio of the individuation process. Ricoeur provides the most philosophically rigorous scaffolding, arguing through the concept of narrative identity that the self is never a static substance but a dynamic construction continuously reconstituted through emplotment, the integration of concordance and discordance across time. For Ricoeur, the most dramatic transformations of personal identity ‘pass through the crucible of this nothingness of identity.’ Welwood approaches reconstitution psychotherapeutically, tracing the dismantling of compensatory ego structures and the emergence of being beyond the ‘cripple identity.’ The Jungian tradition, through Edinger and Jung himself, frames reconstitution mythologically—as the Isis-Osiris reassembly of the dismembered body, an archetypal pattern undergirding both death-rebirth symbolism and the individuation opus. Frank situates reconstitution in illness narrative, where the interrupted self must discover new purpose through storytelling. Yalom introduces the temporal paradox: that reconstituting the self involves simultaneously reconstituting one’s past. What unites these disparate voices is the shared recognition that identity is not recovered but remade, that dissolution precedes recomposition, and that narrative, mythic, or relational structures are the vehicles of that remaking.