Within the depth-psychology and comparative-religion corpus, honey occupies a liminal symbolic position between the mortal and the divine, the nutritive and the oracular, the chthonic and the celestial. Onians’ philological investigations establish honey’s firm distinction from ambrosia: whereas the latter connotes divine immortality beyond mortal reach, honey remains emphatically the foodstuff of humans—stored, traded, mixed with wine and cheese—and is conspicuously absent from Homeric offerings to the gods. Kerényi deepens this reading considerably, tracing melikratos (honey-milk mixture) as the primordial libation for the dead and situating honey within a complex Cretan mythological ecology: the infant Zeus is nourished on honey in the golden liknon; bees arise from the carcass of the sacrificed ox in a myth of zoe; and the very association of bears with honey-eating illuminates archaic ritual containers. López-Pedraza and Kerényi together highlight the oracular dimension: the three virginal bee-sisters attached to Hermes dispense truth or falsehood according to whether they have received honey—a motif that links sweetness to prophetic authenticity. Edinger, reading through Jung, extends honey into an incarnational register: in the Cave of the Nymphs passage from the Odyssey, honey images the coagulatio process by which psychic insight descends into embodied, concrete life. Neumann situates honey within Great Mother symbolism, noting its sacrifice to earth goddesses and its position as mediator between plant and animal realms. Nietzsche, characteristically, appropriates honey as bait—the sweet lure by which the philosopher-fisherman draws humanity upward. The term thus traverses ritual, cosmological, alchemical, and psychological registers, serving as a persistent index of the tension between nourishment and transcendence, truth and seduction, mortal substance and immortal aspiration.