Within the depth-psychology corpus, honesty is not treated as a simple moral virtue but as a psychodynamic capacity whose exercise is constrained, enabled, and sometimes radically distorted by trauma, shame, denial, and the structures of self-deception. Najavits’s clinical work on PTSD and substance abuse places honesty at the very center of recovery, arguing that dishonesty — whether active lying or the subtler betrayals of self-denial — functions as a protective maneuver against unbearable affect, and that the restoration of honesty with oneself is prerequisite to honesty with others. Kurtz, writing on Alcoholics Anonymous, elevates this insight into a philosophical register: the ‘shared honesty of mutual vulnerability’ constitutes the communal glue of AA and the antidote to the self-centeredness Kurtz identifies as the root pathology. The ACA literature extends the analysis to relational systems, showing how withholding and compartmentalized honesty calcify into patterns of control and resentment that perpetuate dysfunctional family dynamics. Jacoby, from the Jungian side, frames honesty within the I-Thou analytic encounter as an ethical obligation — something owed the analysand by virtue of the relational bond itself. Running across these positions is a productive tension: rigorous honesty is consistently valorized, yet the literature equally warns against self-laceration masquerading as candor. The ancient sources — Snell, Benveniste, Cairns — provide the conceptual archaeology, linking Greek prohibitions against lying to the foundations of communal trust and oath-taking.