Across the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Home’ emerges not as a geographical coordinate but as a psychic state—an interior condition of wholeness, fitting, and self-possession. Clarissa Pinkola Estés offers the most sustained phenomenology: home is ‘an internal place, a place somewhere in time rather than space, where a woman feels of one piece,’ and it is holographic, capable of being carried in a single tree or drop of water. Ernest Kurtz and Katherine Ketcham locate home within a spirituality of imperfection, defining it as the place ‘where one’s very hide fits’—a site of vulnerability, healing, and narrative belonging. The Homeric corpus provides the mythic substrate: the Odyssey constructs home as the supreme telos of human striving, the longed-for Ithaca toward which every wandering tends, and M. H. Abrams traces this Odyssean nostos into Romantic literature as the circuitous quest of consciousness returning to itself. Taoist psychology, through Liu I-ming, inverts the figure: the human body is itself ‘like a home,’ the psychic faculties its inhabitants, properly ordered when the mind of Tao governs. Giegerich invokes home ironically, warning against psychology’s tendency to remain a ‘stay-at-home,’ comfortable and unchallenged. Together these voices establish home as one of depth psychology’s most charged topoi: the place of origin, the goal of individuation, and the measure of psychic integration.