The High Priestess occupies a singular position within the depth-psychology corpus on Tarot: she is the primary archetype of feminine interiority, threshold knowledge, and the unconscious as a generative force. Across the major interpreters — Pollack, Nichols, Hamaker-Zondag, Banzhaf, Jodorowsky — the figure is consistently read as the complement and counterweight to the Magician’s active, exteriorizing will. She does not create; she receives, gestate, and preserves — a distinction that commentators treat as ontologically, not merely functionally, different from masculine agency. Pollack assigns her the ‘dark, mysterious and hidden’ aspect of the feminine archetype, carefully distinguished from the Empress’s benign emotionality. Hamaker-Zondag, reading from a Jungian framework, locates her energy squarely in the unconscious, linking it to paranormal receptivity and meditative stillness. Banzhaf situates her as the ‘heavenly mother’ in a mythic parental dyad, the bearer of a ‘wisdom of the womb’ that intuits rather than legislates meaning. Nichols, through Jungian amplification, attends to her receptivity as a theological stance — she ‘is chosen’ rather than choosing. Jodorowsky, the most semiotic reader, treats her as potentiality held at the threshold: knowledge incubated but not yet transmitted. A persistent tension runs through all these accounts: whether her stillness constitutes a spiritual ideal or a developmental arrest, and whether her association with passivity reflects archetype or patriarchal projection.