The hermaphroditic figure occupies a peculiarly dense node in the depth-psychology corpus, traversing alchemical symbolism, mythological scholarship, clinical phenomenology, and theories of psychic wholeness. Jung establishes the term’s central register: the hermaphrodite is an archetype of the preconscious, undifferentiated condition — ‘asexual’ in the strict sense because the two poles cancel each other — appearing in dreams at transitional moments of individuation. Yet it is simultaneously the goal of that process: Mercurius, the hermaphrodite par excellence, names the psyche itself as an ‘anima media natura,’ a half-bodily, half-spiritual being capable of uniting opposites. Neumann extends this into a developmental schema, reading the recovery of ‘original hermaphroditism’ through assimilation of anima or animus as a mature, integrative achievement rather than a regressive one. Kerényi grounds the figure mythologically in Hermaphroditos — the fused body of Hermes’ son and the naiad Salmakis — and in the domestic cult image representing the ‘primal condition restored in marriage.’ López-Pedraza radicalises the clinical significance: the Hermaphrodite provides a unique ‘bisexual hermetic consciousness’ that liberates therapeutic imagination from sexual polarity altogether. Adler’s 1910 concept of ‘psychic hermaphroditism,’ retrieved by Hillman, adds a further, more ambivalent strand, linking the figure to inferiority and antithetical thinking. Together these voices stage an unresolved tension between the hermaphroditic as primordial regression and as integrative telos.