Heat occupies a remarkably polyvalent position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as cosmological principle, alchemical operator, mystical force, and psycho-somatic metaphor. The richest treatment belongs to James Hillman, whose Alchemical Psychology constructs an entire phenomenology of degrees, types, and dangers of heat as the animating medium of psychological transformation. For Hillman, heat is not mere temperature but the essential condition of the opus: ‘The Spirit is Heat,’ he cites from Figulus, and every alchemical operation—calcination, sublimation, distillation—demands a calibrated application of fire to matter and soul alike. Premature or excessive heat destroys the germ of life; insufficient heat leaves moisture undried and transformation incomplete. Mircea Eliade extends the term into comparative religion, demonstrating that ‘mystical heat’ or tapas is a pan-cultural index of magico-religious power: through extreme inner heat, the ascetic creates, prophesies, and incarnates divine force. The Stoic tradition, documented by Long and Sedley, identifies vital heat as the sustaining principle of the entire cosmos, with ‘designing fire’ underpinning all biological and divine activity. Heraclitus treats heat as a pole in the fundamental cosmic rhythm of warming and cooling. Taken together, these traditions reveal heat as the depth-psychological figure for transformation itself—the threshold condition under which fixed forms dissolve, essences emerge, and new individuation becomes possible.