Calcination — rendered in the alchemical literature as calcinatio — occupies a privileged position in the depth-psychological reception of alchemy, standing as the operation most frequently placed at the threshold of the Great Work. Edward Edinger, whose systematic chapter-length treatment in Anatomy of the Psyche (1985) remains the locus classicus for Jungian readers, reads calcination as the fiery purging of ‘radical moisture’ — the unconscious, desirousness-laden identifications through which archetypal energies are captured by the ego. The operation’s psychological yield is a fine white ash or calx that Edinger identifies with salt, wisdom, and a hard-won immunity to affect. James Hillman, approaching the same territory from an imaginal rather than a developmental standpoint, stresses calcination’s epistemological dimension: the reduction of overdetermined psychic material to its ‘hot core,’ stripping away personal association and causality to deliver an objective correlative of pure essence. Hillman also enters the crucial caveat that premature calcination — desiccating criticism, abstract analysis deployed against germinal life — destroys rather than refines. Lyndy Abraham’s lexicographical entries contextualize ash and calx within the albedo sequence, linking calcination to congelation and putrefaction as adjacent stages. The governing tension across the corpus is between calcination as necessary purification and calcination as dangerous over-drying; between fire as transformative agent and fire as annihilating excess. Salt, sulfur, mortificatio, solutio, albedo, and the nigredo are the concepts most densely co-present with this term.