The gun appears in the depth-psychology corpus not as a single symbol but as a cluster of psychic and cultural phenomena, each carrying distinct theoretical weight. James Hillman treats the gun as the instrument of psychopathy and psychosis, distinguishing it sharply from neurosis: neurotics, he contends, do not reach for firearms, whereas the gun belongs to the acting-out psychology of cities like Dallas, places of unprocessed shadow and bloodguilt. Hillman also invokes the gun metaphorically in political fantasies of the senex — the isolated, self-sufficient individual armed against an encroaching world. Eknath Easwaran reads the gun as an objectification of inner suspicion and separateness: the instrument does not generate violence, but suspicion and separateness pull the trigger. The ACT literature deploys the gun as a pedagogical metaphor — a coercive scenario that demonstrates the fundamental difference between voluntary behavior and involuntary inner states. In trauma literature, a simulated gun appears in re-enactment scenarios, illustrating the compulsive repetition of unresolved danger. Across the addiction literature, guns surface as enforcement mechanisms within prohibition economies, where criminal authority replaces legal protection. The corpus reveals a consistent deep-psychological consensus: the gun externalizes and literalizes psychic contents — aggression, paranoia, shadow — that have failed integration.