Violence occupies a contested and multi-layered position within the depth-psychology corpus. No single voice dominates; instead, the literature distributes violence across biological, cultural, psychological, and even cosmological registers. Damasio roots violence in inherited mammalian behavioral repertoires, observing that cultural evolution has not diminished but rather elaborated its forms. Herman’s clinical and feminist scholarship situates violence as a systemic instrument of coercion — domestic, political, and sexual — whose organized repetition dismantles the psyche’s coherence. Levine traces the somatic aftermath of violence in the nervous system, attending to how trapped survival responses erupt in antisocial rage or implode into dissociation. Sardello, working in a Steiner-inflected imaginal register, reads violence as an ontological feature of cosmogenesis — the necessary, transformative force by which the soul of the world reformulates itself. Han introduces the concept of a ‘violence of positivity,’ a systemic pressure arising not from the negative or the alien but from an excess of sameness. Bryant’s commentary on the Yoga Sutras frames violence as the paradigmatic violation of ahimsa, a moral category with karmic, dietary, and intentional dimensions. Bowlby and Shapiro document the intergenerational transmission of violence through attachment disruption and power asymmetry. Together these voices reveal violence as simultaneously biological inheritance, cultural institution, traumatic wound, psychological symptom, cosmological principle, and ethical transgression.