The female body occupies a contested and generative site within the depth-psychology corpus, traversing registers from the mythopoeic to the neuroscientific, from the clinical to the cultural-critical. Clarissa Pinkola Estés reclaims the female body as a cosmological container and instinctual sensor, resisting the culture’s reduction of it to sculptural object or moral index. Marion Woodman, from a Jungian clinical perspective, treats embodiment itself as the spiritual work: the female body is simultaneously temple, symptom, and oracle, and its systematic devaluation — manifest in anorexia, obesity, and compulsive perfectionism — is read as a civilizational pathology inseparable from the repression of the feminine principle. James Hillman provides a genealogical critique, exposing how historical theories of the female body have been overwhelmingly constructed by masculine consciousness, embedding archetypal fantasies of inferiority into anatomy and embryology. Peter Levine approaches the female body through somatic trauma theory, arguing that male disembodiment contributes structurally to women’s objectification and eating disorders. Karl Abraham’s classical psychoanalytic material surfaces the female body as a dreamwork site for castration and pre-oedipal fantasy. Together, these voices reveal a field-wide tension between the body as archetype-made-flesh and the body as site of patriarchal inscription, with embodiment, soul, and cultural critique as the convergent stakes.