Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Expression’ occupies a peculiarly contested site where philosophy of language, somatic neuroscience, creative therapeutics, and semiotic theory converge without resolution. McNiff constructs expression as the irreducible telos of the arts-healing encounter — not a symptom to be decoded but a living energetic process whose full range, spanning all sensory modalities, constitutes both the therapeutic medium and the therapeutic outcome. Merleau-Ponty radicalizes this by insisting that expression is not the clothing of pre-formed thought but its very body, an existential meaning that inhabits words rather than being conveyed by them. Derrida, reading Husserl, complicates the picture further: expression is at once reflective and essentially incomplete, a conceptual formality that can in principle repeat sense yet simultaneously displaces it irreparably. Jung encodes expression within his symbol theory, arguing that genuine symbolic expression is always the best possible formulation of something relatively unknown — distinguishing it sharply from mere semiotic signs. Freud’s dream-work locates a second species of displacement in the change of verbal expression itself, where abstract thought-content is exchanged for pictorial, concrete form. Siegel and Porges ground expressive phenomena in neurobiological substrates — facial expression, autonomic tone, and the vagal circuitry of emotional communication. The central tension throughout is whether expression discloses or constitutes its content, and whether therapeutic power lies in the act of expression itself or in its subsequent interpretation.