Within the depth-psychology corpus, electricity functions across at least three distinct registers that rarely converge but collectively illuminate the discipline’s relationship to natural science, technology, and symbolic life. In the first register — represented most systematically by Simondon and corroborated by Kandel and Pauli — electricity is a paradigm case for the epistemological problem of individuation: the discovery of the electron’s quantized charge forces thought to reckon with the discontinuous structure of matter, demanding new modes of transductive reasoning that neither pure deduction nor pure induction can supply. In the second register, exemplified by Sardello’s depth-cultural critique and Giegerich’s archetypal logic, electricity becomes a civilizational symbol — the power source of an ‘imitation world,’ and a figure for polarity as an ontological principle (no negative pole, no positive). In the third, neuroscientific register (Kandel), electrical signaling in neurons is the physical substrate of memory and sensation, bridging natural philosophy and the science of mind. Arroyo extends this into bioelectromagnetic speculation tying planetary cycles to organic electrical fields. What unites these registers is a shared preoccupation with discontinuity, polarity, and the question of whether electrical phenomena model psychic ones — a tension that Pauli, correspondingly, treats as a live problem at the boundary of quantum theory and psychological epistemology.