Ego integration occupies a pivotal and contested position across the depth-psychology corpus, standing at the crossroads of developmental theory, clinical metapsychology, and the philosophy of psychic wholeness. The term designates the progressive consolidation of the ego out of earlier states of fragmentation, splitting, and undifferentiated flux — a process that is never linear, never complete, and perpetually threatened by regression. Klein situates the drive toward integration as one of the ego’s primal functions, tracing its dialectical emergence from the alternating rhythms of disintegration and cohesion that characterize the paranoid-schizoid and depressive positions. Winnicott reformulates the question developmentally, insisting that integration presupposes a holding environment and matches, structurally, the maternal function of holding. Jung and his inheritors approach integration from the direction of the unconscious: the ego must assimilate — rather than be overwhelmed by — the counter-position of the unconscious, a process central to individuation and the transcendent function. Samuels maps the Post-Jungian debates, noting that the strength and style of ego-consciousness determine the quality of any integration achieved. Hillman dissents, arguing that the very ideal of a ‘strong ego’ represents a Protestant therapeutic bias that colonizes imagination. Across these voices runs a shared recognition: ego integration is not the elimination of inner conflict but its metabolization into a more capacious and resilient psychic structure.