Ecological Unconscious

The ecological unconscious names that stratum of psychic life in which the human soul remains embedded within, and continuous with, the living body of the earth — a layer of being that modern Western culture has systematically repressed but that depth psychology increasingly treats as foundational to both individual and collective health. The corpus does not yield a single, settled doctrine but rather a field of convergent pressures. Hillman’s archetypal ecology frames the repressed as no longer merely the personal unconscious of childhood wounds but beauty, justice, and the animate world itself; his invocation of anima mundi locates soul not inside the skin but in things and places. Abram, drawing on Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of flesh, argues that the perceptual bond between sentient body and animate earth constitutes the original layer of experience, one that alphabetic literacy and technological mediation occlude rather than dissolve. Brazier and the ecopsychology orbit (Macy, Naess) propose a ‘greening of the self’ — an expansion of identity to encompass the biosphere — as both therapeutic and ethical imperative. Hillman’s Pan essay extends the argument archetypally: the suppression of Pan in the psyche is the precise interior correlate of ecological destruction in the world. Across these positions the tension is consistent: between a depth psychology that continues to locate the unconscious intra-psychically and an emerging ecopsychological claim that the unconscious is, at its deepest stratum, the very life of the world pressing through us.

In the library

part of the ecological field is human nature, in whose psyche the archetypes dominate. If Pan is suppressed there, nature and instinct will go astray no matter how we strain on rational levels

Hillman argues that ecological restoration is impossible without restoring the suppressed archetypal layer of the psyche — the ecological unconscious conceived as the Pan-nature within.

Hillman, James; Roscher, Wilhelm Heinrich, Pan and the Nightmare, 1972thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the conventional notion of the self… is being undermined… replaced by wider constructs of identity and self-interest — by what you might call the ecological self or eco-self, co-extensive with other beings and the life of our planet

Brazier, citing Macy, presents the dissolution of the skin-encapsulated ego into an ecological self as the depth-psychological dimension of the Green Movement’s challenge to unconscious anthropocentrism.

Brazier, David, Zen Therapy: Transcending the Sorrows of the Human Mind, 1995thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Our ecological fears announce that things are where the soul now claims psychological attention… because of this resurrecting ghost in matter we are aware at last again of the anima mundi

Hillman reads ecological anxiety as a symptomatic return of the repressed anima mundi — the world-soul that materialist metaphysics declared dead, now asserting its claims through pathological channels.

Hillman, James, The Thought of the Heart and the Soul of the World, 1992thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we have to broaden the notion of environment in terms of ‘deep ecology,’ the hypothesis that the planet is a living, breathing, and self-regulating organism… the environment itself is ensouled, animated, inextricably meshed with us

Hillman extends the concept of environment beyond the personal to the ensouled, self-regulating earth, grounding the ecological unconscious in a participatory ontology aligned with deep ecology.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

our sentient bodies are entirely continuous with the vast body of the land… ‘the presence of the world is precisely the presence of its flesh to my flesh’

Abram, via Merleau-Ponty, articulates the ontological ground of the ecological unconscious: the perceptual flesh of the body is continuous with the flesh of the world, making ecological estrangement a form of perceptual repression.

Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, 1996thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

If our primordial experience is inherently animistic… how can we account for the loss of such animateness from the world around us?… We may suspect… that the apparent loss of participation has something to do with language

Abram frames the ecological unconscious as the suppression of primordial animistic perception, attributing the mechanism of repression primarily to the distorting effects of alphabetic language.

Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the repressed unconscious was no longer childhood and family matters… but beauty and justice… declared the fundamental principles of an ecological psychotherapy

Hillman redefines the content of the repressed unconscious as beauty and justice — the aesthetic-ethical claims of the world — thereby grounding ecological psychotherapy in a revised conception of what depth psychology represses.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

one man alone, Jesuit-educated René Descartes, drove Orpheus from the world, leaving it as dead matter to be used and abused to the profit of one species only

Hillman identifies the Cartesian disenchantment of nature as the historical event that constituted the ecological unconscious by expelling the soul-in-nature — Orpheus and Pan — from the Western psyche.

Hillman, James, Mythic Figures, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

shame seems to be the emotion of ecology, as aidos is a characteristic word appropriate to Artemis, that lovely elusive lady of the woods, springs, hills, and clearings

Hillman associates shame — aidos — with Artemis and the ecological domain, suggesting that the repression of shame before the natural world is constitutive of ecological unconsciousness.

Hillman, James, Mythic Figures, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Once we have opened the ecological eye, where does environment — even immediate, unshared, private, individual environment — stop?

Hillman’s ‘ecological eye’ designates the perceptual faculty that the ecological unconscious recovers: a capacity to recognize the boundless interpenetration of self and world.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the inner soul and the outer soil have a permeable osmotic connection, so that where there is forcible expulsion… they feel their own souls deteriorating

Hillman documents, via indigenous testimony, the lived reality of the ecological unconscious: the soul is not bounded by skin but osmotically continuous with the specific terrain it inhabits.

Hillman, James, Mythic Figures, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

technological civilization must accept the invitation of gravity and settle back into the land, its political and economic structures diversifying into the varied contours and rhythms of a more-than-human earth

Abram articulates the political-ecological corollary of the ecological unconscious: recovery demands that culture re-embed itself in specific bioregions, reversing the abstraction that constitutes ecological repression.

Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

our nervous system synapsed to the terminal, we do not notice that the chorus of frogs by the nearby stream has dwindled… the song sparrows no longer return to the trees

Abram offers a phenomenological image of the ecological unconscious in operation: technological mediation anesthetizes sensory participation with the local living world, rendering ecological loss imperceptible.

Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the outpouring of technological by-products and pollutants since the Industrial Revolution… before its effects would begin to impinge upon our breathing bodies, inexorably drawing us back to our senses

Abram suggests that ecological crisis itself functions as the somatic return of the repressed — the earth forcing its way back into human perception through the bodily consequences of pollution.

Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, 1996aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

No organism in nature is separate from the system in which it lives, functions and dies… the ecological view sees addiction as a changeable and evolving dynamic that expresses a lifelong interaction with a person’s social and emotional surroundings

Maté applies an ecological systems perspective to addiction, implicitly extending the ecological unconscious thesis by treating psychological disorders as inseparable from their environmental contexts.

Maté, Gabor, In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters With Addiction, 2008aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we need a new and enjoyable animism that children would be the first to understand… Pollution is not only chemical and radioactive. There is psychological pollution, too

Hillman extends the ecological unconscious into everyday ethics, arguing that the failure to treat things as ensouled generates psychological pollution parallel to chemical contamination.

Hillman, James, Kinds of Power: A Guide to Its Intelligent Uses, 1995aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

imagination does not grow all by itself in the household… children are ‘by nature’ at home in the world; the world invites them to grow down and take part

Hillman, citing Edith Cobb, locates the ecological unconscious developmentally: the child’s imagination is nurtured by sensory contact with the natural world, contact that modern parentalism increasingly forecloses.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms