Dwelling in the depth-psychology corpus is never merely a matter of shelter or habitation; it designates the fundamental act by which psyche constitutes a world it can inhabit, and the reciprocal act by which place constitutes soul. The literature divides roughly into three registers. The cosmogonic register, represented most forcefully by Eliade, treats every act of settling and building as an imitation of divine creation, a repetition of cosmogony that transforms chaotic space into ordered, inhabitable cosmos. The phenomenological-archetypal register, developed by Sardello, Moore, and implicitly by Jung’s account of Bollingen Tower, holds that specific architectural features — rooms, doors, thresholds — are not neutral containers but soul-structures that actively shape psychological life, each space animating distinct aspects of the self. A third, linguistic-ontological register surfaces through Heidegger’s famous formulation, quoted in Derrida, that ‘language is the house of Being in which man ek-sists by dwelling’ — a claim that ties dwelling irrevocably to existential presence and ontological disclosure. Across these registers, dwelling also carries a pathological valence: in Buddhist usage (Trungpa), ‘dwelling upon’ something denotes the fixation that generates ego-suffering, making non-dwelling a spiritual goal. The term thus traverses ontology, sacred geography, psychoarchitecture, and contemplative psychology — a genuine crossroads concept within the library.