Dopaminergic hypofunction — the insufficiency or underactivation of dopaminergic neurotransmission — occupies a pivotal, if contested, position within the depth-psychology and neuropsychoanalytic corpus. The term surfaces most systematically in Blum and colleagues’ elaboration of Reward Deficiency Syndrome, where hypofunctional dopamine signaling, particularly at the D2 receptor, is posited as the neurogenetic substrate underlying a spectrum of compulsive, addictive, and attentional disorders including ADHD. Here, dopaminergic hypofunction is not merely a pharmacological datum but a heritable constitutional vulnerability that shapes motivational architecture from childhood onward. Koob’s neurocircuitry framework extends this logic to addiction, identifying decreased dopaminergic reward-system function during withdrawal as a driver of negative affect and relapse. Wynchank introduces a sex-specific dimension, demonstrating that oestrogen-modulated dopamine availability renders women with ADHD particularly susceptible to cyclic hypofunctional states during the luteal phase. Berridge, by contrast, complicates any simple hypofunction narrative: his incentive-sensitization work shows that dopamine governs ‘wanting’ rather than ‘liking,’ and that dopamine suppression in Parkinson’s patients does not straightforwardly produce addictive compulsion. Schore’s developmental perspective situates mesocortical dopaminergic activity within early attachment and orbitofrontal maturation, implying that environmental deprivation can induce functionally analogous hypofunctional states. The corpus thus presents dopaminergic hypofunction as simultaneously genetic, developmental, hormonal, and circuit-level in its origins and consequences.