The Divine Voice occupies a compelling and contested position across the depth-psychology corpus, appearing variously as an inner psychic authority, a transmundane summons, a feminine Wisdom figure, and a linguistic-ontological phenomenon rooted in archaic Indo-European culture. Jung addresses the problem with characteristic ambivalence: he acknowledges the phenomenological reality of the voice heard in dreams and visions while noting modern resistance to treating such utterances as the command of a superior power. For Corbin, working through the Sufi metaphysics of Ibn Arabi and Rumi, the divine voice is nothing less than the Word of Compassion breathed into the mystic heart — absolute, transpersonal, yet mediated through a vassal’s throat. The Gnostic materials collected by Meyer and Jonas present the Call as a literally transmundane intrusion — the ‘Call from Without’ that penetrates the world-enclosure and awakens the sleeping pneumatic self. Benveniste’s philological analysis traces the divine voice to archaic Greek pheme and the Roman deity Aius Locutius, establishing it as a cultural category denoting utterances of impersonal, oracular, or portentous character. Campbell, Harvey, and Baring foreground the Divine Voice as a feminine presence — Shekinah, Sophia — speaking from the hidden ground of creation. Taken together, these sources reveal a persistent tension between subjective psychological interpretation and genuine ontological claim.