Divine Light occupies a contested and multi-valent position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as ontological reality, experiential phenomenon, and symbol of transformative illumination. The Philokalia’s hesychast tradition, particularly through Gregory Palamas, presents divine light as the uncreated energies of God — not metaphor but literal theophanic radiance, as disclosed on Mount Tabor — accessible to the purified intellect through the illumination of the Holy Spirit. This tradition insists on the distinction between divine essence (unknowable) and divine energy (participable), making light the very medium of deification. Henry Corbin, reading Iranian Sufism, relocates divine light within a metaphysics of photisms and visionary perception, where colored and black lights map the soul’s ascent and where ‘wisdom of light’ names a mode of symbolic cognition operating through the mundus imaginalis. Aurobindo recasts the concept in evolutionary terms, identifying divine light with supramental gnosis — a self-luminous truth-consciousness that supersedes inferential reason. The Kabbalistic tradition, represented in Harvey, Campbell, and Armstrong, configures divine light as the emanating radiance of Ein Sof, transmitted through sefirotic veils. Hillman introduces a crucial psychological tension: the lighting of ego-consciousness simultaneously darkens the archetypal penumbra, complicating any simple equation of divine light with spiritual progress. Across these traditions, the central tension is whether divine light is experientially accessible, symbolically mediated, or ontologically prior to all subjectivity.