Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘disease’ functions simultaneously as a clinical category, a philosophical problem, and a psychosymbolic event. The tradition refuses any single account. At one pole, the biomedical disease model — endorsed by institutions such as the National Institutes of Health and operationalized in addiction medicine — locates pathology in neurological deviation and cellular disruption; Marc Lewis subjects this model to sustained critique, arguing that brain change may index learning rather than disease proper. At another pole, Thomas Moore and James Hillman read illness as soul-speech, a purposive interruption demanding hermeneutic rather than merely pharmaceutical response. Gabor Maté situates disease within a web of intergenerational trauma, social conditioning, and emotional history, resisting both biological determinism and moral blame. Robert Sardello draws on Bechamp and Steiner to reframe disease as an event of elemental imbalance — a failure of soul-body coherence — rather than external bacterial invasion. Ruth Padel traces the Greek precedent in which illness, pollution, and passion form an inseparable triad. Allan Schore repositions disease as dysregulation of communication networks, integrating psychoanalytic and psychobiological frameworks. Across these voices, a persistent tension obtains: between disease as something one has, something one is, and something one is called by.