Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Curse’ functions as a remarkably dense nexus where linguistic act, psychic reality, and transgenerational fate converge. The Greek materials — traversed by Dodds, Adkins, Padel, Otto, Burkert, and Rohde — treat the curse not merely as imprecation but as an activated metaphysical force: the spoken word (ara) that, once uttered, cannot be retracted, and that recruits supernatural agencies — Erinyes, Ate, chthonic deities — to accomplish its work in time. Aeschylus’s exploration of the inherited curse in the houses of Laius and Atreus provides the paradigmatic instance: the curse operates ‘in the house, in the blood, in the mind,’ raising the urgent question whether the accursed retain moral freedom at all. Padel develops this psychologically, showing how Erinyes — activated by harm-wishing words within intimate relationships — render curses self-fulfilling by internalizing them as daemonic agencies of the mind itself. The alchemical strand, present in Jung’s Practice of Psychotherapy, transmutes the curse into a symbol of prima materia: divine wrath and curse are the very medium in which the Tincture of Life is hidden. The New Testament dimension, represented by Thielman, reframes the curse as a juridical-soteriological category redeemed by vicarious substitution. Across these strata, the curse marks the threshold where language, fate, inherited guilt, and psychological compulsion become indistinguishable.