The Creative Feminine occupies a generative locus in the depth-psychological corpus, functioning simultaneously as an archetypal force, a psychological capacity, and a cosmological principle. Erich Neumann, in The Great Mother, grounds the term in the transformative character of feminine symbolism — the vessel, the womb, the earth — treating creativity as an activity intrinsic to the Feminine as such, not merely analogous to it. Henry Corbin, reading Ibn ‘Arabi, elevates the Creative Feminine into metaphysical territory: woman as theophanic mirror, as creatrix who is herself created, embodying the twofold active-passive dimension of the divine Compassion. James Hillman, in The Myth of Analysis, problematizes inherited notions, distinguishing the mothering-regressive model of creativity from a more differentiated eros-laden feminine principle associated with the anima figure. Clarissa Pinkola Estés transposes the theme into lived feminine psychology, insisting that creative force flows through psychic channels prepared by the Wild Woman archetype, and that its blockage — especially through a negative animus — constitutes a pathological condition. Marion Woodman integrates the Creative Feminine with body, voice, and the spiritual dimension of artistic making, identifying creativity with the virgin soul’s openness to spirit. Across these positions the central tension is between the Creative Feminine as universal cosmic ground and as specifically embodied, psychologically realised capacity — a polarity that defines the term’s continued vitality in the literature.