The Wild Woman Archetype occupies a singular and generative position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as ontological claim, clinical concept, and cultural-political diagnosis. Clarissa Pinkola Estés, whose Women Who Run With the Wolves (1992/2017) constitutes the primary and near-exclusive locus of the archetype’s elaboration, treats Wild Woman not as a metaphor but as a genuine transpersonal substratum of feminine psychic life — a ‘two-million-year-old’ instinctual stratum whose suppression she reads as coextensive with the despoliation of natural wilderness. The archetype encompasses intuition, cyclical creativity, somatic knowledge, and what Estés terms ‘wildish nature,’ a quality distinct from social disorder. The central tension in the corpus runs between the archetype’s claimed universality across cultures and eras and its particular historical predicament: the sustained patriarchal and institutional effort to loot, overwrite, or domesticate it. Robert Bly’s parallel treatment of the Wild Man archetype in Iron John offers a masculine counterpart, situating wildness in medieval and folkloric registers, though without Estés’s systematic clinical framework. Within the Estés corpus itself, the interpretive tension is between the Wild Woman as immanent and indestructible — she ‘bounds up again’ regardless of suppression — and the severe psychic cost exacted upon women who have been severed from her. The archetype is ultimately medicinal: its recovery, through myth, story, dream, and active imagination, is proposed as the ground of women’s psychological wholeness.