The term ‘constructed emotion’ enters the depth-psychology corpus almost entirely through Lisa Feldman Barrett’s landmark 2017 synthesis, where it names a comprehensive theoretical framework that inverts the dominant ‘classical view’ of emotion as hard-wired, universal, and biologically fingerprinted. Barrett’s theory of constructed emotion holds that emotions are not triggered responses to stimuli but are actively built, moment by moment, from prior experience, conceptual knowledge, interoceptive sensation, and cultural scaffolding. The brain, operating as a predictive organ, generates simulations drawn from past experience and deploys emotion concepts — acquired through language, social context, and affective niche — to categorize ambiguous bodily states and make them meaningful. Crucially, this framework denies that any emotion possesses a stable bodily or neural fingerprint; variation across instances is the norm, not the exception. The theory draws on social constructionism, predictive processing, and population thinking derived from Darwin, while claiming neuroscientific grounding in interoceptive and control network research. It stands in direct tension with Ekmanian classical emotion theory and with depth-psychological models that treat emotions as universal eruptions from a phylogenetically older substrate. Siegel’s developmental model, which emphasizes appraisal and arousal as precursors to hedonic tone, offers a partial contrast, preserving a more layered, stage-based construction that retains primary emotional states prior to conceptual elaboration.