The term ‘conscious’ occupies a pivotal and contested position across the depth-psychology corpus, serving simultaneously as a phenomenological datum, a neurobiological problem, a structural concept within psychic topology, and a philosophical horizon. Damasio approaches consciousness as a triadic construct — wakefulness, mind, and self — whose evolutionary function is the optimization of homeostatic life-regulation, and whose subjective pole requires a felt sense of ownership and perspective. Jaynes, by contrast, interrogates what consciousness is not, dismantling the assumption that it is coextensive with reactivity, learning, or problem-solving, and advances the startling thesis that its primary feature is a spatialized metaphorical analog of the self. For Freud, the conscious is the narrower sphere inscribed within the larger unconscious; for Jung, the boundary between the two proves paradoxical — no content can be said to be wholly conscious, and the ego itself, as the sole referent of conscious orientation, cannot verify the unconscious with certainty. Thompson situates consciousness within the continuity of life and mind, arguing that its basic form is bodily sentience grounded in autopoietic identity. Neumann historicizes ego consciousness as a partial, developmental system, while Aurobindo extends the question into transpersonal registers, positing planes of consciousness that exceed ordinary mental functioning. The recurrent tension is between consciousness as transparent self-presence and as a partial, bounded, and always already unconsciously conditioned achievement.