Conjunction — the mysterium coniunctionis of alchemical tradition and the planetary aspect of archetypal astrology — commands one of the most expansive and contested conceptual territories in the depth-psychology corpus. Jung’s monumental Mysterium Coniunctionis treats it as the telos of the alchemical opus: the reconciliation of psychic opposites, a work of synthesis that is simultaneously physical, moral, and transcendental, never achievable without prior separatio and purification. Edinger and von Franz extend this reading, insisting that the coniunctio presupposes cleansing — that contaminated, complex-laden attitudes must be differentiated before genuine union becomes possible. Hillman complicates the sexual register typically attached to conjunction, arguing that in certain alchemical texts the conjunction dissolves gender itself, becoming a ‘flowing conversation of images’ mediated by a white vapor that dissolves the identities of both bodies entering relation. In the archetypal-astrological literature, Tarnas mobilizes conjunction as a precise cyclical marker: Jupiter-Uranus conjunctions correlate with breakthrough creativity and revolutionary discovery; Saturn-Pluto conjunctions with mass violence, political repression, and structural transformation; Neptune-Pluto conjunctions with deep civilizational threshold-crossings. This breadth — from intrapsychic integration to cosmic timing — makes conjunction a term that bridges alchemical psychology, analytical practice, and a reconstructed philosophy of history. The tension between its intimate, transformative sense and its macro-historical, astronomical sense remains productively unresolved across the corpus.