Concentration

meditation

Concentration—rendered in Sanskrit as dhāraṇā and in its meditative extension as dhyāna—occupies a structurally pivotal position across the depth-psychological and contemplative traditions represented in this library. Sri Aurobindo treats it as one of three indispensable movements of the higher knowledge—purification, concentration, identification—and insists that it is not merely attentive reasoning but a sustained dwelling on the ‘fruitful essence of the idea’ that dissolves the discursive mind into self-possessed stillness. Patañjali’s commentators, particularly Bryant, situate dhāraṇā as the sixth limb of the aṣṭāṅga sequence, the inaugural act of internalization that precedes dhyāna and samādhi, and explain its mechanics through the dynamic contest of nirodha-saṃskāras and vyutthāna-saṃskāras. The Zen and Tibetan streams complicate this picture: Jung, reading a Chinese text, observes that genuine Eastern meditation may be ‘devoid of mental concentration’ in any Western sense, pointing toward a dissolution of focal consciousness rather than its intensification. Cooper distinguishes quietist or concentration techniques from vipaśyanā insight practices, tracing how traditions variously sequence or integrate them. Easwaran’s popular register translates the power of concentration into an accessible analogy—the lens that focuses dispersed solar heat into flame—foregrounding its practical urgency for ethical and psychological transformation. Hakuin and the Zen tradition identify two kinds of concentration: upon ultimate truth and upon somatic locus. Collectively, these voices reveal a field marked by productive tension between concentration as effortful fixing of attention and concentration as the paradoxical gateway to an effortless, non-centred awareness.

In the library

Purity and concentration are indeed two aspects, feminine and masculine, passive and active, of the same status of being;

Aurobindo establishes concentration and purity as complementary, inseparable poles of a single integral yogic being, giving concentration an ontological rather than merely methodological status.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Synthesis of Yoga, 1948thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The first step in concentration must be always to accustom the discursive mind to a settled unwavering pursuit of a single course of connected thought on a single subject

Aurobindo maps the developmental arc of concentration from disciplining the discursive mind to an inward dwelling on the ‘fruitful essence’ of an idea, culminating in the Self-possessed state that transcends effortful thought.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Synthesis of Yoga, 1948thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It does this by three movements each necessary to each other, by each of which the others become complete, — purification, concentration, identification.

Aurobindo situates concentration within a triadic methodology of the higher knowledge, making it structurally indispensable to the process of realizing divine reality in and through the universe.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Synthesis of Yoga, 1948thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Dhāraṇā, concentration, Patañjali states, involves fixing the mind on one place, deśa-bandha.

Bryant explicates Patañjali’s technical definition of dhāraṇā as the binding of mind to a single locus, positioning it as the sixth limb and the threshold between external and fully interior yogic practice.

Bryant, Edwin F., The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary, 2009thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if we take ‘devoid of mental concentration’ literally, it can only mean that the meditation does not centre upon anything. Not being centred, it would be rather like a dissolution of consciousness and hence a direct approach to the unconscious condition.

Jung identifies a fundamental divergence between Western focal concentration and certain Eastern meditative forms that, far from intensifying attention, dissolve its centring function as a direct approach to the unconscious.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychology and Religion: West and East, 1958thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

There are, I believe, two kinds of concentration: concentration on ultimate truth and concentration on temporary truth.

Hakuin’s teacher articulates a Zen typology distinguishing meditation on the ultimate nature of reality from somatic concentration focused on the elixir field, both yielding distinct but complementary benefits.

Hakuin Ekaku, Wild Ivy: The Spiritual Autobiography of Zen Master Hakuin, 1999thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

they are divided into ‘quietist’ or concentration techniques and wisdom or ‘insight’ techniques… In the Rinzai Zen tradition, concentration techniques, such as counting the breath, often serve to prepare the practitioner for kanna-zen or kōan introspection

Cooper maps the structural relationship between concentration as a quietist preparatory technique and insight practice, showing how traditions variously sequence these modalities on the path to awakening.

Cooper, Seiso Paul, Zen Insight, Psychoanalytic Action: Two Arrows Meeting, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

when the yogī sets about meditating, what is actually occurring is that a restraining nirodha set of saṃskāras is being cultivated to suppress the normal flow of mundane outgoing, vyutthāna, saṃskāras

Bryant explains the psycho-mechanical substrate of meditative concentration in Patañjali’s system as a dynamic contest between restraining and outgoing saṃskāras, never fully resolved even in deep meditation.

Bryant, Edwin F., The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali: A New Edition, Translation, and Commentary, 2009supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the heat that had been diffused had been brought together to bear on one point through the lens. This is more or less what we do in the practice of meditation.

Easwaran deploys the focal-lens analogy to translate the principle of concentration into accessible psychological terms, framing meditative practice as the harnessing of dispersed mental energy toward a single transformative point.

Easwaran, Eknath, The Bhagavad Gita for Daily Living: A Verse-by-Verse Commentary, 1975supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

all things in the activity are, we have seen, a concentration of Tapas in movement of force upon its object. The origin of the Ignorance must then be sought for in some self-absorbed concentration of Tapas

Aurobindo extends concentration beyond psychological practice into a cosmological principle, identifying the self-absorbed concentration of Conscious-Force as the very mechanism producing cosmic ignorance and individuation.

Aurobindo, Sri, The Life Divine, 1939supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Yoga gives the practitioner a concentration and self-discipline so powerful that it could become demonic if used for selfish ends.

Armstrong frames concentration as a morally ambivalent power requiring an ethical foundation of yama before its practice, lest its intensity be subverted by egotism.

Armstrong, Karen, Buddha, 2000supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Put your mind and awareness in that vacuum of the armpit, both vacuums of the armpits, and you will enter in samādhi… when the concentration on the armpits has taken the appeased state

The Vijñāna Bhairava tradition presents somatic micro-concentration on bodily vacuums as a direct āṇavopāya technique for entering samādhi, illustrating the diversity of concentration objects within the tantric canon.

Singh, Jaideva, Vijnana Bhairava: The Manual for Self-Realization, 1979supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Buddhist meditation tends to intensify certain ego functions so that the sense of self is at once magnified and deconstructed.

Epstein distinguishes meditative concentration from psychotherapeutic reconstruction of narrative, arguing that Buddhist practice uses intensified attention paradoxically to deconstruct the very self it appears to magnify.

Epstein, Mark, Thoughts Without a Thinker: Psychotherapy from a Buddhist Perspective, 1995supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

they did not mean that one should fasten ones thoughts to the tip of the nose… How can it be directed at the same time upward (yellow middle), and downward (tip of the nose)?

Wilhelm’s Taoist text warns against literalising the object of concentration, arguing that fixing thought on a physical point confuses the pointing finger with the moon and misreads the deeper intent of contemplative instruction.

Wilhelm, Richard, The Secret of the Golden Flower: A Chinese Book of Life, 1931supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

A recent study using MRI was conducted to assess the cortical thickness in 20 participants with extensive Insight meditation experience involving focused attention to internal experiences.

Mohandas situates meditative concentration within neurobiological research, reporting cortical thickness changes associated with sustained focused attention and implying a neuroplastic substrate for concentrative practice.

Mohandas, E., Neurobiology of Spirituality, 2008supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The essence of meditation could be described quite simply, in Tenzin Wangyal’s words, as ‘presence in the gap’—as an act of nondual, unitive knowing

Welwood reframes meditative concentration not as effortful fixing of attention but as open, nondual presence within the gap between thoughts, aligning with Dzogchen’s critique of focal concentration as a subtle grasping.

Welwood, John, Toward a Psychology of Awakening Buddhism, Psychotherapy,, 2000supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Bill Wilson advocates meditation because ‘one of its major fruits is emotional balance’… Jung was apparently critical of Eastern philosophies, including meditation.

McCabe juxtaposes Wilson’s pragmatic endorsement of meditation for emotional balance against Jung’s critical ambivalence toward Eastern contemplative methods, revealing the contested status of meditation within Western depth psychology.

McCabe, Ian, Carl Jung and Alcoholics Anonymous: The Twelve Steps as a Spiritual Journey of Individuation, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Meditation taps a source of tremendous power, and the other seven points in this program play a vital role in harnessing this power so that it can be used wisely for the benefit of all.

Easwaran embeds meditative concentration within an eight-point ethical and somatic programme, arguing that its power requires the governance of supporting disciplines to be transformative rather than merely experiential.

Easwaran, Eknath, The Bhagavad Gita for Daily Living: A Verse-by-Verse Commentary, 1975aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in some types of meditation the aim is to ‘clear the mind of all thoughts.’ This is the very opposite of mindfulness meditation, where you have no expectation the ‘mind will clear’

Harris distinguishes concentrative mind-clearing meditation from ACT-aligned mindfulness, cautioning clinicians against conflating these divergent practices and their opposed orientations toward mental content.

Harris, Russ, ACT Made Simple: An Easy-To-Read Primer on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 2009aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms