The term ‘compass’ enters the depth-psychology corpus along several distinct axes that, taken together, reveal its symbolic weight as an instrument of orientation — both literal and psychic. In the I Ching commentaries of Ritsema and Karcher, ‘The Universal Compass’ names the complete cosmological system organizing the trigrams, hexagrams, and Transformative Moments into a cyclic, directional whole; here compass is nothing less than the architectonic frame of reality’s unfolding. Nichols, reading Blake’s image of the Creator wielding a compass to draw the macrocosmic circle, situates the instrument at the origin of creation itself — the divine act of bounding and giving form to the infinite. In the addiction-recovery literature of Berger and Dennett, the moral and personal compass functions as a metaphor for the self-regulating, value-oriented guidance system whose disruption or abandonment signals the pathological surrender to compulsion. Shaw deploys the navigational compass with its one-degree error as a parable of sin’s insidious deviation from intended course. What unites these readings is a shared concern with directedness, centering, and the calibration of psychic or cosmic orientation. The tension in the corpus lies between compass as a cosmological given — the Universal Compass of Chinese metaphysics — and compass as a personal, ethical, and psychological achievement that must be cultivated, honored, and defended against distortion.