Within the Seba depth-psychology corpus, ‘Commandment’ operates across several distinct but mutually illuminating registers. In the patristic and hesychast literature gathered in the Philokalia, the commandment functions as an ontological and therapeutic instrument: divine injunctions are understood not as arbitrary impositions but as prescriptions that heal the tripartite soul—its incensive, desiring, and intellectual powers—by aligning them with the Logos. Gregory of Sinai, Philotheos of Sinai, Peter of Damaskos, and Gregory Palamas each develop this theme with characteristic precision, treating the commandments of the Gospel as a graduated curriculum whose observance constitutes participatory union with God. A quite different accent appears in Albrecht Dihle’s intellectual-historical analysis: for Dihle, the Biblical commandment is structurally decisive for the entire Western theory of will, because it introduces a voluntaristic model of moral responsibility unavailable to Greek cognitivism—obedience or disobedience, not understanding, determines moral worth. Karl Abraham, reading the Decalogue through the psychoanalytic lens, finds the prohibition on images juxtaposed with monotheistic loyalty in ways that illuminate the unconscious dynamics of doubt, scopophilia, and parental ambivalence. Campbell and Jacoby round out the range: the former locating Jesus’s summary commandment within the contrast between Essene exclusivism and universal love, the latter interrogating the commandment to love one’s neighbor as a structure that can, paradoxically, eclipse genuine I-Thou relation. The term thus anchors debates about will, law, image, love, and therapeutic transformation.