The Body of Light occupies a distinctive and recurring position across the depth-psychology corpus as both a phenomenological datum and a soteriological aspiration. Its most sustained and rigorous treatment appears in Henry Corbin’s scholarship on Iranian Sufism, where the concept designates the luminous, subtle body of the mystic — variously called the ‘person of light,’ the ‘man of light,’ or the inner celestial double — that emerges through stages of spiritual transformation corresponding to visionary experiences of colored lights. Corbin situates this figure at the intersection of Zoroastrian Xvarnah theology, Manichaean light-particle metaphysics, and Sufi photismic doctrine, insisting that the ‘physiology of the man of light’ is irreducible to material biology yet demands rigorous phenomenological analysis. Jung’s parallel engagement, drawn through Paracelsus and alchemy, frames the inner body (corpus subtile, breath-body) as the vehicle of the lumen naturae — the natural light given to the inner man, eternally transfigured and distinct from the outer corporeal form. The Secret of the Golden Flower, via Wilhelm, contributes the Taoist idiom of a ‘body beyond the body’ crystallized through the circulation of light. Plotinus supplies the Neoplatonic scaffolding in which soul illuminates body as light illuminates air — present without being resident, incorporeal yet efficacious. Taken together, these voices establish the Body of Light as the depth-psychological correlate of individuation’s luminous telos: the imperishable subtle form that supervenes upon, and ultimately transcends, corporeal existence.