Attitudinal Values

Attitudinal values occupy a distinctive but undertheorized position in the depth-psychology corpus. The concept draws its primary force from Viktor Frankl’s logotherapeutic framework, where attitudinal values represent one of three pathways through which meaning may be realized — specifically, the stance one takes toward unavoidable suffering. Within the Jungian literature surveyed here, however, the term appears only obliquely, absorbed into the broader typological discourse on attitude-types (extraversion/introversion) and on what Henderson calls ‘cultural attitudes.’ Jung himself treats ‘attitude’ as a disposition that carries evaluative weight — maxims, ideals, and emulated personalities all distill into attitudinal stances — but his frame is typological rather than axiological in the Franklian sense. Hillman’s archetypal psychology further complicates matters by insisting that no attitudinal tendency is developmentally superior to another, leveling the hierarchy that a strictly logotherapeutic reading might imply. The tension in the corpus is therefore between attitude as psychological type (a structural, largely inherited orientation) and attitude as consciously chosen moral stance (the existential-phenomenological register in which ‘attitudinal values’ most precisely belong). That Franklian precision is largely absent from the Jungian sources, making the concordance of this term an exercise in triangulation across adjacent vocabularies.

In the library 11 passages

most attitudes are based, consciously or unconsciously, on some kind of maxim which often has the character of a proverb… the quintessence of an attitude is neither a maxim nor an ideal but a personality who is revered and emulated.

Jung argues that an attitude — the substrate from which attitudinal values emerge — is not merely a cognitive stance but a condensed moral-evaluative orientation crystallized around maxims, ideals, or exemplary figures.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, 1960thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Neither of these two attitudinal tendencies is superior to the other and neither is an evolution of the other. They are givens and given as equals.

Hillman explicitly refuses a developmental hierarchy among attitudinal tendencies, arguing that introversion and extraversion — and by extension the value-stances they carry — are equiprimordial rather than ranked achievements.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology, 1983thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Neither of these two attitudinal tendencies is superior to the other and neither is an evolution of the other. They are givens and given as equals.

A parallel statement to the preceding, reinforcing Hillman’s anti-hierarchical position on attitudinal stances across both the monograph and its abbreviated companion volume.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Reason, therefore, is the capacity to be reasonable, a definite attitude that enables us to think, feel, and act in accordance with objective values.

Jung here links attitude directly to the realization of objective values through rational orientation, suggesting a structural affinity between attitudinal stance and the apprehension of value.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The aesthetic attitude is grounded in the individual experience of beauty and the often exuberant conviction that emerges from such an experience that the beauty one has glimpsed is united to the perception of something beyond it.

Beebe, following Henderson, elaborates a taxonomy of cultural attitudes — aesthetic, philosophic, religious, social — each of which functions as a value-laden orientation toward experience, closely paralleling the concept of attitudinal values.

Beebe, John, Energies and Patterns in Psychological Type: The Reservoir of Consciousness, 2017supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

a psychological perspective emerges in analysis that affects the way traditional cultural attitudes are appropriated and used… taking from traditional religions mainly what is psychologically relevant to the person.

Beebe describes how Henderson’s psychological attitude transforms the reception of cultural value-systems, enacting at the collective level something analogous to the individual attitudinal reorientation that attitudinal values require.

Beebe, John, Energies and Patterns in Psychological Type: The Reservoir of Consciousness, 2017supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Weak instincts are one of the prime causes of the development of an habitual one-sided attitude, though in the last resort it is conditioned or reinforced by heredity.

Jung traces the genesis of fixed attitudinal orientations to constitutional factors, framing the one-sided attitude as a developmental liability rather than a freely chosen value-stance.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we shall discover… that in spite of the great variety of conscious motives and tendencies, certain groups of individuals can be distinguished who are characterized by a striking conformity of motivation.

Jung’s typological empiricism identifies stable attitudinal clusters motivating perception, feeling, and action — the observational basis from which a theory of attitudinal values might be constructed.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

must go as well the attitudinal background of medicine against which the analyst’s work has hitherto been judged and by which it has been oppressed and shadowed.

Hillman invokes ‘attitudinal background’ as an institutional value-framework that constrains clinical practice, gesturing toward the way collective attitudinal values shape professional identity.

Hillman, James, Suicide and the Soul, 1964aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

unless there is a further differentiation of values, where they advance in subtlety and human comprehension, the function itself does not move, only the focus of its attention.

Von Franz implies that genuine psychological development requires not merely a shift in attentional focus but a qualitative deepening of the value-structure underlying one’s dominant attitude.

Marie-Louise von Franz, James Hillman, Lectures on Jung’s Typology, 2013aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms