Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) enters the depth-psychology corpus not as a purely behavioral classification but as a contested site where neurobiology, dopaminergic reward architecture, developmental trauma, and addictive phenomenology converge and sometimes collide. The dominant neurobiological strand — represented by Blum, Rubia, Faraone, and their collaborators — frames ADHD as a disorder of dopaminergic insufficiency, executive dysfunction, and heritable reward deficiency, supported by twin studies, genetic analyses of the DRD2 A1 allele, and fMRI evidence of frontocingulate underactivation normalised by methylphenidate. Against this pharmacogenetic consensus stands Gabor Maté’s trauma-inflected reading, which argues that the genetic heritability of ADHD is overstated and that the disorder’s intimate link with addiction reflects shared developmental and environmental antecedents rather than shared genes. A further strand addresses the pharmacotherapeutic apparatus itself: Rubia’s systematic reviews and meta-analyses interrogate how stimulants — methylphenidate and amphetamine — normalise dysfunctional brain networks, while Wilens examines the clinical and ethical complexities of treating ADHD comorbid with substance-use disorders. Emerging work on hormonal modulation (Wynchank, Findeis) opens a gendered dimension long occluded in the literature. The corpus thus holds in productive tension a biomedical model oriented toward neurochemical correction and a psychosocial model insisting that symptom clusters must be read against the relational and cultural conditions of their emergence.