Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Attachment Disorder’ does not present as a single, stable diagnostic category but rather as a constellation of relational and developmental failures whose consequences ramify across the full breadth of psychopathology. The corpus is dominated by the Bowlbian inheritance—internal working models, Strange Situation classifications, and the sequelae of insecure, disorganized, and anxious-ambivalent attachment—yet it is Flores (2004) who most explicitly deploys the term as an organizing clinical construct, arguing that addiction is itself a form of attachment disorder: a substitution of chemical bonding for the failed interpersonal kind. Courtois and Lanius extend the framework into complex trauma, demonstrating that early attachment disorganization predicts dissociative disorders, PTSD, and the full architecture of complex posttraumatic sequelae. Siegel’s interpersonal neurobiology and Ogden’s sensorimotor approaches integrate these findings with neurological data, showing how disrupted attachment literally shapes neural architecture. A productive tension runs through the corpus between those who treat attachment disorder as an intrapsychic phenomenon—fixed internal working models resistant to disconfirmation—and those who locate it in ongoing relational systems amenable to repair. Lench’s emotion-regulation literature adds a further register, linking attachment insecurity to depression, OCD, PTSD, and eating disorders. What unites these voices is the conviction that disordered attachment is not merely a childhood misfortune but the generative matrix of adult psychopathology.