Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘atmosphere’ operates across at least three distinct registers that rarely collapse into one another. The first is elemental and cosmological: atmosphere as air, the primordial medium supporting earth, fire, and water in ancient Greek and pre-Socratic thought (Anaximenes, Anaximander, Plato’s Timaeus), where it carries, envelops, and governs all other substances. The second is phenomenological and psychological: atmosphere as the felt, quasi-tactile surround of an emotional or relational situation — what von Franz calls the field that feeling-types ‘tune into,’ and what Jung identifies as ‘psychic atmosphere’ capable of penetrating a child’s instinctual life. The third is imaginal and poetic: atmosphere as the ‘soul of the visible landscape’ (Abram), the invisible medium through which animate beings share breath, and through which song, prayer, and imagination exert influence on reality. Moore extends this into dreamwork as a ‘liquid atmosphere of fantasy.’ Kerenyi gestures toward atmosphere as the total aesthetic-emotional register surrounding a mythic figure such as Aphrodite. What unites these positions is the conviction that atmosphere is never merely physical backdrop but an active, mediating agency — permeable, communicative, and psychically charged. The tension in the corpus runs between those who phenomenologize atmosphere as irreducibly experienced and those who embed it in cosmological or theological frameworks.