Ascent functions in the depth-psychology corpus as a master trope unifying shamanic, alchemical, Platonic, and Christian spiritual itineraries under a common structural logic: the soul, spirit, or consciousness moves from a lower to a higher register of being, and this movement is at once cosmological, psychological, and soteriological. Eliade establishes the archaic ground: from Siberian initiation rites to Australian medicine men, shamanic vocation is inseparable from the capacity for celestial ascent—by ladder, tree, rope, smoke, or ecstatic flight—and this motif ramifies across cultures too numerous to trace to a single origin. Climacus systematizes the figure into the thirty-rung Ladder of Divine Ascent, making hierarchical moral and contemplative progress the very architecture of the spiritual life. Jung and the alchemical corpus he reads disclose a paradox: genuine ascent requires a prior or concomitant descent—the spagyric foetus rises to heaven only to descend again, transformed. Sri Aurobindo configures ascent as evolutionary necessity, the means by which consciousness surpasses the mental plane and enters supramental existence. Nussbaum’s Platonic analysis of the Diotima ascent in the Symposium interrogates its cost—what unique erotic attachment to individuals must be relinquished for philosophical elevation. Across all these registers, the tension between ascent as liberation and ascent as renunciation remains irreducible.