Within the depth-psychology corpus, aging is treated not as mere biological decline but as a psychically charged passage demanding its own hermeneutic. The dominant voice is James Hillman, whose extended meditation in The Force of Character reframes aging as an archetypal phenomenon: old age constitutes a structure, not merely a process, possessing its own aesthetic logic, symbolic density, and telos oriented toward the intensification of character rather than toward death. Hillman argues against both the pessimistic and optimistic cultural attitudes, exposing their shared premise — that old age is affliction — as itself the chief affliction. He proposes instead that aging be read as a transformation in beauty, a work of soul-making in which the body becomes a field of metaphors and the face a portrait in progress. Murray Stein provides a complementary archetypal-developmental framing, identifying the refusal of aging with the puer aeternus pathology and insisting that the body’s transformation is integral to individuation rather than a deficiency to be cosmetically corrected. Thomas Moore links aging to the Saturnine soul-work of deepening, reflection, and honest encounter with time. Esther Harding addresses the psychological inner preparation required as the body’s diminishment announces mortality. Stanislav Grof illuminates the shadow dimension — fear of aging as an existential dread encoded in the unconscious. Across these voices, the central tension is between reductive biology and psychological meaning-making, between ageism and archetypal affirmation.