Within the depth-psychology corpus, Abundance functions less as a simple condition of material plenitude than as a dynamic, morally weighted state whose inner logic tends toward its own undoing. The term enters the literature primarily through commentary on Hexagram 55 (Feng) of the I Ching, where it is consistently glossed as fullness that contains the seed of waning — a peak condition governed by the same cyclical law that produces scarcity. Wang Bi’s classical commentary establishes the foundational tension: abundance is not a stable possession but a momentary crest of the cosmic tide, and those who mistake it for a permanent condition court ‘satiation’ and eventual ruin. This reading is amplified across the Wilhelm, Huang, Anthony, and Ritsema-Karcher translations, each of which nuances whether abundance demands active moral restraint, humble self-concealment, or the courage to act decisively before the moment passes. A secondary line of inquiry, evident in Frank’s medical-ethical work, inverts the conventional polarity entirely: suffering itself may constitute a form of abundance when it is honestly acknowledged and offered within a relation of reciprocity. Plotinus introduces a further metaphysical dimension, positioning abundance as a property of the Intellectual-Principle that nonetheless remains derivative of an even prior Source. Across these registers, Abundance is inseparable from questions of timing, restraint, transparency, and the ethics of influence.