Abstraction

Abstraction occupies a pivotal, contested position across the depth-psychology corpus. Jung furnishes the most architecturally precise treatment, defining it in the Psychological Types glossary as the 'drawing out or singling out of a content from a context made up of other elements whose combination into a whole is something unique or individual'—a mental activity that severs the essential from the irrelevant through differentiation. For Jung, abstraction is inseparable from the introversion-extraversion polarity and from Worringer's paired aesthetic categories of abstraction and empathy, where the urge to abstraction arises from 'a great inner uneasiness' before the phenomenal world, expressing itself in spiritual dread and transcendental religion. Bion carries the concept into clinical epistemology: abstraction is not merely cognitive but constitutive of symbol-formation itself, a product of alpha-function transforming raw emotional experience into usable mental elements; its pathological failure—when words become things—is diagnostic of psychotic states. McGilchrist reframes abstraction as a hemispheric disposition, linking it to left-hemisphere power-thought that gains purchase on the world precisely by omitting the irrelevant particular. Havelock and Snell situate abstraction historically, tracing its emergence in Greek thought through grammatical and philosophical innovations. Bosnak locates alchemical 'subtle bodies' at the boundary between physicality and abstraction. These varied treatments converge on a shared tension: abstraction enables cognition but risks severing the subject from the living, embodied particular.

In the library

Abstraction, therefore, is a form of mental activity that frees this content from its association with the irrelevant elements by distinguishing it from them or, in other words, differentiating it.

Jung's canonical definition establishes abstraction as the psychic operation of differentiation by which an essential content is extracted from its unique, incomparable context.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Abstraction thus seems to be a function that is at war with the original state of participation mystique. Its purpose is to break the object's hold on the subject.

Jung argues that abstraction functions as a liberating rupture from the undifferentiated fusion of subject and object characteristic of archaic participation mystique.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the urge to abstraction is the outcome of a great inner uneasiness inspired in man by these phenomena, and its religious counterpart is the strongly transcendental colouring of all ideas.

Drawing on Worringer, Jung identifies the libidinal root of abstraction as existential dread before the world, producing a transcendental rather than empathic orientation toward objects.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Since the process of abstraction is not incidental and one to be discarded at will, positive steps have to be taken for an individual to achieve the state of mind, seen in some psychotics, in which the capacity for abstraction is destroyed.

Bion demonstrates that abstraction is a foundational psychic capacity whose destruction—as in psychosis where words become things—must be actively achieved, not merely lost.

Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, Learning from Experience, 1962thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The first course leads directly to a discussion of the importance of abstraction, which may, in this context, be regarded as an aspect of the transformation, by alpha-function, of an emotional experience into alpha-elements.

Bion integrates abstraction into his theory of mental development, identifying it as a dimension of alpha-function's conversion of raw emotional experience into thinkable elements.

Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, Learning from Experience, 1962thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

THE MODEL MAY BE REGARDED as an abstraction from an emotional experience or as a concretization of an abstraction.

Bion positions the psychoanalytic model as oscillating between abstraction and concretization, illuminating how theory and experience are mutually constitutive.

Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, Learning from Experience, 1962thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

From the emotional experience the infant abstracts certain elements, what they are depending partly on the infant; these abstracted elements are given a name 'Daddy' in other situations in which the same elements appear to be conjoined.

Bion models abstraction developmentally as the infant's extraction of invariant elements from emotional experience, forming the basis for naming and conceptual thought.

Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, Learning from Experience, 1962supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the more irrelevant details we can omit from our purview, the more powerful our thoughts will become.

McGilchrist, citing Russell, exposes abstraction as the instrument of left-hemisphere power-thought, which gains mastery over the world by systematically excluding the particular.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the more irrelevant details we can omit from our purview, the more powerful our thoughts will become.

McGilchrist, citing Russell, exposes abstraction as the instrument of left-hemisphere power-thought, which gains mastery over the world by systematically excluding the particular.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

'The first thing the intellect does with an object' … 'is to class it along with something else.' It is Procrustean: it simply chops off all that makes one individual different from another.

McGilchrist invokes James and Nietzsche to characterize abstraction as a Procrustean operation of the intellect that destroys the irreducible individuality of phenomena.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

'The first thing the intellect does with an object' … 'is to class it along with something else.' It is Procrustean: it simply chops off all that makes one individual different from another.

McGilchrist invokes James and Nietzsche to characterize abstraction as a Procrustean operation of the intellect that destroys the irreducible individuality of phenomena.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he distinguishes two forms: abstraction and empathy. He speaks of the urge to abstraction and the urge to empathy, thereby making clear the libidinal nature of these two forms, the stirring of the élan vital.

Jung maps Worringer's paired aesthetic drives—abstraction and empathy—onto his own introversion-extraversion typology, grounding both in libidinal energy.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the first thinker of Athens turns out to be a man who devotes his entire energy to defining more precisely the character of this Greek drive towards abstraction.

Havelock situates Socrates as the culminating figure in the pre-Socratic development of abstraction as a cultural and cognitive achievement of the Greek mind.

Eric A. Havelock, Preface to Plato, 1963supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The article is capable of making a substantive out of an adjective or a verb; and these substantiations, in the field of philosophy and science, serve as the stab[ilizing framework for abstraction].

Snell traces the grammatical prehistory of abstraction in the Greek generic article, showing how linguistic structure enabled the emergence of philosophical abstract thought.

Snell, Bruno, The discovery of the mind; the Greek origins of European, 1953supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Subtle bodies are embodiments existing between physicality and abstraction, in a realm of quasi-physicality, which we have called embodied imag[ination].

Bosnak locates alchemical subtle bodies at the threshold between matter and abstraction, proposing an intermediate ontological zone that neither pure embodiment nor pure concept can occupy alone.

Bosnak, Robert, Embodiment: Creative Imagination in Medicine, Art and Travel, 2007supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Natural science is, however, possible only where the physical is unequivocally distinguished from the non-physical.

Snell argues that the capacity for abstraction required for natural science depends on a clean ontological separation between the physical and non-physical, which mythic and figurative language could not supply.

Snell, Bruno, The discovery of the mind; the Greek origins of European, 1953supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The abstracting, self-contained attitude is evident; it is even made the supreme rule of conduct.

Jung reads Schiller's self-enclosing introversion as an instance of the abstracting attitude elevated into an ethical principle, linking character typology to epistemic orientation.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Consciousness, ego, and will … tend to loosen up the bonds between the material and the dynamic components of the unconscious … to control and assimilate the material components.

Neumann frames the abstractive movement of consciousness away from emotion and instinct as a necessary, if costly, developmental achievement of the Western ego.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

ornament, with its recurring motive, shows a distinctly rhythmic character although, by contrast, the rhythm itself is as it were frozen, abstract, or dead.

Rank observes that ornamentation represents a paradoxical form of abstraction in primitive art, where living rhythm is arrested into geometric repetition.

Rank, Otto, Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development, 1932aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Stilpon taught that generic concepts are without reality and objective validity. Anyone, therefore, who speaks of 'man' speaks of nobody, because he is designating neither this nor that.

Jung introduces the Megarian and Antisthenic rejection of universals as a historical counterpoint to Platonic realism, framing the nominalist critique as implicitly anti-abstractionist.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms