The subtle body occupies a contested yet generative position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a technical term from Indian cosmology, an alchemical and Neoplatonic category, and a live hypothesis in Jungian and post-Jungian thought about the interface of psyche and matter. In the Vedantic and yogic literature mediated through Easwaran, the subtle body (sukshma-sharira) designates an energetic double of the gross physical organism, composed of prana and encompassing mind, intellect, desire, and will — the inner lining, as Easwaran phrases it, of the corporeal glove. Aurobindo extends this topology into a complex metaphysics of sheaths, identifying subtle and vital bodies as the vehicles through which supramental consciousness must descend. Henry Corbin, working in a Sufi register, locates the ‘acquired’ subtle body as the embryonic mold of spiritual transformation within Islamic mystical physiology. Bosnak’s alchemical reading positions the subtle body between physicality and abstraction, coining the phrase ‘quasi-physicality’ to describe embodied imagination. Jung himself, as reported by von Franz, provisionally welcomed the hypothesis of a perceptual subtle body interposed between the somatic and psychic registers, treating the paucity of conscious bodily self-knowledge as indirect evidence for its existence. Together these voices constitute a field in productive tension: ontological assertion versus phenomenological caution, Eastern cosmological mapping versus Western psychological reappropriation.