Kalsched Writes

In mythology, archetypal representatives of the archaic Self's ambivalent nature are always Tricksters. Hermes/Mercurius was Jung's favorite example. The Trickster is ideally suited to be an agent of transformation because he/she carries both sides of a split in the psyche. The Trickster is evil and good, loving and hateful, male and female, and thus holds the opposites together while also keeping them differentiated. Shape-shifting at will, he/she is the transformer who also gets transformed.

— Donald Kalsched

Hermes moves between the living and the dead — that is his oldest office, psychopomp, escort across thresholds. What Kalsched is pressing on is why trauma specifically requires this kind of figure at its center: not a healer, not a wise elder, but a god who cannot be fixed to either side of any polarity. The archaic Self, organizing around catastrophic wounding, doesn't produce clean defenses. It produces something trickster-shaped: a protector that persecutes, a comforter that isolates, an inner companion that turns destructive at the precise moment intimacy becomes possible. If you have ever watched a person self-sabotage the relationship they have most needed, you have watched this figure work.

The shape-shifting is not metaphor. It names the structural problem of treating trauma — that the same psychic complex which attacks the person also holds whatever life-force has survived intact. There is no surgery available that removes the attacker without damaging the protector, because they are the same image wearing different faces at different moments. Hermes/Mercurius suited Jung for exactly this reason: he is patron of thieves and of travelers, of commerce and of the underworld passage — the same god, not two gods in uneasy alliance. The transformation Kalsched points to only becomes thinkable when the soul stops trying to resolve the ambivalence and begins to recognize it as structure.


Donald Kalsched·The Inner World of Trauma: Archetypal Defences of the Personal Spirit·1996