Hollis Writes

By what power, what authority, even what mo-tive, can the father exercise such an effect over his son? Just as a ^^ In The Penal Colony, pp. 49-66. ^ The Dyer's Hand, p. 159. Father Hunger 87 glance at Medusa's face would turn men to stone in classical mythol-ogy, so we have in "The Judgment" a portrayal of the power of the negative father complex. This Satumian shadow has the capacity to fall over a son's spirit and crush him. The son reaches out for a positive masculine experience with his friend, but, for reasons not explained, the father tumbles to his rival and shuts off his son's only hope of escape. The complex, then, has the power to cut off his spirit, to tamp the fires of life and plunge him into the obliterating waters of the unconscious. So, instead of bringing his son light, the father brings suffocating darkness. Such negative fathers built what Blake called the "dark, satanic mills."^^ They also built Auschwitz. They built arrogant theologies that burned men at the stake and crushed them on the wheel. They have created an iron world without light, without soul. When their sons reach out for life they crush and destroy them.

— James Hollis

The Medusa comparison earns its place here. To meet that gaze was not to be destroyed outright but to be fixed — turned from living flesh into permanent form, from possibility into monument. What Hollis is tracking in the negative father complex is precisely this: not violence in the ordinary sense, but a petrifying authority that arrests development at the moment of its reaching. The son in Kafka's story does not fail to try; he reaches toward a friend, toward some positive masculine figure outside the father's gravity. The complex's work is to intercept that reach and make it the occasion of annihilation.

Blake's "dark, satanic mills" are the right image because the mills were not chaos — they were relentless order, mechanized repetition, the systematic extraction of life for production. The negative father does not introduce disorder into the psyche; he introduces a brutal organizing principle, a counter-individuation that runs on the son's energy while foreclosing his becoming. Auschwitz, the inquisition's wheel, the arrogant theologies — Hollis is not making these equivalences carelessly. Each is a structure in which the father-principle has metastasized from forming the son into consuming him. What cannot be individuated in the inner world does not simply stay there.


James Hollis·Under Saturn's Shadow: The Wounding and Healing of Men·1994