Jung proposed a very different model, one which involved a veritable 'Copernican revolution' in psychology in that the total psyche - the self - becomes the centre, with the ego relegated to a subordinate status. The self, according to Jung, is 'an unconscious prefiguration of the ego. It is not I who create myself, but rather I happen to myself.' Thus the 'ego stands to the self as the moved to the mover, or as object to subject, because the determining factors which radiate out from the self surround the ego on all sides and are therefore supraordinate to it
— J. J. Clarke
Jung's metaphor is precise and worth staying inside for a moment. The ego does not sit at the center of the psyche looking outward — it is already downstream, already an effect of something it cannot fully see. "It is not I who create myself, but rather I happen to myself." That phrasing lands differently depending on where you are when you read it. For someone who has organized their life around the certainty of self-authorship — the belief that enough will, enough effort, enough development will finally produce the person they are supposed to be — it arrives as a small structural demolition.
The Copernican move Jung is making cuts in two directions simultaneously. It displaces the ego from sovereignty, yes, but it also displaces the common spiritual fantasy that there is a higher, truer self waiting to be reached if only the lower one is transcended. The self as Jung uses it here is not an achievement or a destination; it is the mover, already surrounding and preceding the ego, which finds itself moved. The implication is uncomfortable: you cannot get behind the self to evaluate it, cannot adopt it as a goal, cannot spiritually bypass your way into alignment with it. You are already inside the field it generates. What individuates is not the ego climbing toward something brighter — it is the self pressing through.
J. J. Clarke·Jung and Eastern Thought: A Dialogue with the Orient·1994